Carpal Tunnel Syndrome — ABOS Oral Boards Preparation
What examiners expect and how to prepare
Clinical Scenario
A 48-year-old right-hand-dominant female dental hygienist presents to your office with an 18-month history of progressive numbness and tingling in her right hand. Symptoms are worst at night, waking her from sleep, and she finds relief by shaking her hand. Over the past 3 months, she has noticed difficulty with fine motor tasks — buttoning shirts and gripping dental instruments. She has no history of wrist trauma, thyroid disease, diabetes, or inflammatory arthritis. She tried a wrist splint at night for 8 weeks and a corticosteroid injection 4 months ago, both with temporary improvement.
On exam, she has diminished two-point discrimination at 8 mm (normal < 6 mm) in the index and middle fingers. Thenar atrophy is visible compared to the left hand. Tinel sign is positive at the carpal tunnel. Phalen test reproduces symptoms at 15 seconds. Durkan compression test is positive. Grip strength is diminished at 18 kg (compared to 28 kg on the left). Sensation in the dorsal hand and small finger is normal. No Wartenberg sign. Allen test shows normal vascular inflow.
Electrodiagnostic studies confirm severe carpal tunnel syndrome with prolonged distal motor and sensory latencies and reduced thenar motor amplitudes. There is no evidence of cervical radiculopathy or ulnar neuropathy.
You performed a mini-open carpal tunnel release through a 2 cm incision ulnar to the thenar crease. The transverse carpal ligament was divided under direct visualization from distal to proximal. A thickened, fibrotic flexor synovium was noted but no formal synovectomy was performed. The median nerve appeared flattened with a visible hourglass deformity at the distal edge of the ligament. Post-operatively, the patient was placed in a soft dressing with immediate finger and wrist range of motion encouraged.
What Examiners Look For
- Data gathering: Occupational demands, duration of symptoms, response to conservative measures, and presence of thenar atrophy — all change the urgency and approach.
- Diagnosis: Describe the provocative tests and their sensitivity/specificity. When are electrodiagnostic studies indicated, and when can you operate without them?
- Treatment plan: What conservative measures should be exhausted before surgery? What are the indications for expedited surgical release?
- Technical skill: Open versus endoscopic versus mini-open — describe your technique and the critical structures at risk (palmar cutaneous branch, recurrent motor branch).
- Complications: What if symptoms do not improve after release? Describe your workup for persistent or recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome.
- Applied knowledge: Discuss the variations in recurrent motor branch anatomy and why this matters surgically.
Common Pitfalls
- Operating without documenting failed conservative management — unless thenar atrophy is present, conservative treatment should be tried.
- Not knowing the anatomy of the recurrent motor branch — extraligamentous, subligamentous, and transligamentous variants.
- Failing to consider alternative diagnoses — cervical radiculopathy, pronator syndrome, and thoracic outlet syndrome can mimic CTS.
- Recommending endoscopic release without being able to discuss its contraindications and complication profile.
- Not counseling the patient that thenar atrophy may not fully recover — this is an important informed consent point.
Key Classifications
Related Scenarios
Free — takes 3 minutes